Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01406
Original file (BC 2014 01406.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01406

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, be corrected to reflect an effective discharge date of 
20 Dec 80.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her date of discharge listed on her DD Form 214 is incorrect.  
It lists 20 Dec 79, when it should reflect 20 Dec 80.  This 
inaccuracy is impacting her ability to meet the eligibility 
requirements for a civil service position that was created 
specifically for her.

She has lost all of her military documentation and cannot show 
the dates are incorrect; however, is quite sure her records are 
in error.  She received an overseas assignment during her last 
six months of service (approximately Oct 80) which she could not 
accept and which was part of the reason for her discharge.  

In support of her request, the applicant submits a copy of her 
DD Form 214.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Records reflect that on 12 Dec 79, the applicant was notified by 
her commander of his intent to discharge her under the 
provisions of AFM 39-12, Separation for Unsuitability, 
Misconduct, Resignation, or Request for Discharge for the Good 
of the Service and Procedures for the Rehabilitation Program, 
Chapter 2, Section B, paragraph 2-15a, with a General discharge 
for Misconduct.

On 19 Dec 79, the Staff Judge Advocate reviewed the discharge 
action and found it legally sufficient.  On the same date, the 
discharge authority approved a General discharge without 
probation and rehabilitation. 

On 20 Dec 79, the applicant was furnished an Under Honorable 
Conditions discharge, and was credited with 2 years, 9 months, 
and 10 days of active service.   

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  The applicant’s date of discharge is 
correctly recorded on her DD Form 214.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPV evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 1 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01406 in Executive Session on 10 Mar 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      , Panel Chair
      , Member
      , Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01406 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 31 Mar 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 21 May 14.
	xhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Oct 14.

						






Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05515

    Original file (BC 2013 05515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05515 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Block 12c (Net Active Service This Period) of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect five years and five months rather than four years and eight months. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00110

    Original file (BC-2013-00110.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The overseas long tour ribbon was omitted based on incorrect Foreign Service time on her DD Form 214. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIPV states that the applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects an incorrect Date Entered Active Duty (Item 12a) and will be corrected to read 12 Aug 77. However, both the DD Form 214 and DD Form 215, Correction to the DD Form 214, reflects the applicant’s full service time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05261

    Original file (BC 2013 05261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05261 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) be changed from 21 Mar 89 to 13 Oct 87 to include credit for the time he spent in Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corp (AFROTC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03387

    Original file (BC 2013 03387.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03387 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to show her Date of Enlistment (DOE) as 26 Jun 1958. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01894

    Original file (BC 2014 01894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to Reserve Order BA-249 dated 19 June 2008, the applicant was promoted to the grade of captain with a DOR of 5 July 2008 in the Reserve of the Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/JAX recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. To obtain relief, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00654

    Original file (BC 2014 00654.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAN defers to AFPC Service Dates Verification Office to address/validate the applicant’s first lieutenant DOR, but does provide information pertaining the applicant’s appointment in the grade of first lieutenant. In accordance with AFI 36-2008, she received 50...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05663

    Original file (BC 2013 05663.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05663 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation From Active Duty, effective 26 Sep 78, be changed to reflect his total active service dates as 11 Dec 71 through 26 Sep 78. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02204

    Original file (BC 2014 02204.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02204 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be amended to reflect her married name. The applicant provides no rationale as to why the Board should consider her untimely application in the interest of justice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03048

    Original file (BC 2014 03048.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03048 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His active duty service commitment (ADSC) of 6 May 20 be changed to 22 May 17. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPV evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He initially signed an AF Form 63 which reflected the three-year concurrent ADSC he was counseled he would...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00141

    Original file (BC 2014 00141.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00141 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive 48 months of additional constructive service credit (CSC) for the time he spent obtaining his Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) degree. Because he received four years of service credit for his MD degree, he was appointed to the grade of captain (O-3). While the Board notes the applicant is requesting 48...